Washington's Next Tariff Move: Section 301 Hearings Land Just Before the Clock Runs Out
- ▸The US Trade Representative's public comment period on proposed Section 301 tariffs covering 59 countries and the European Union closed July 6, 2026, with a hearing held July 7.
- ▸The investigation, framed around forced-labour enforcement failures, proposes tariffs of 10% on 14 economies and 12.5% on the remaining 46, including India, intended to replace the temporary 10% global tariff currently in place under Section 122.
- ▸Unlike Section 122, which is capped at 15% and expires without congressional action, Section 301 carries no statutory rate cap or expiry date, making it a legally sturdier tool after the Supreme Court struck down broader tariffs imposed under emergency powers in February.
- ▸The current Section 122 tariff is due to expire around July 24, giving USTR only about two and a half weeks after the hearing to finalise a replacement before the existing tariff lapses on its own terms.
Washington is about to decide what replaces the temporary 10% tariff that has applied to almost all US imports since February. That tariff, imposed under a law called Section 122 after the Supreme Court struck down a broader set of tariffs earlier this year, is only legally allowed to last 150 days, which puts its expiry around July 24. To have something ready before then, the US Trade Representative has spent months building a case against 59 countries and the European Union, arguing they have failed to stop goods made with forced labour from entering their supply chains. A public comment period on that case closes July 6, with a hearing on July 7. The proposed replacement tariffs are 10% for some countries and 12.5% for others, including India. Unlike the temporary tariff it would replace, this new one, based on a law called Section 301, has no built-in expiry date and no legal cap on the rate, which is exactly why the administration is racing to get it in place.
India sits in the higher of USTR's two proposed Section 301 tiers, facing a 12.5% tariff versus the 10% floor applied to 14 other economies, a rate that would exceed the 10% India currently pays under Section 122 though it remains well below the 18% India faced under the now-defunct IEEPA regime. On roughly $87 billion of annual India-to-US trade, each percentage point matters to exporters in sectors like textiles, gems and jewellery, and pharmaceuticals. The interim US-India trade understanding from late 2025 predates all three tariff regimes discussed here and has not been renegotiated to reflect any of them, leaving Indian exporters exposed to US domestic legal timing rather than a settled bilateral rate.
Primary Sources
Cite This Article
Khagan Rao. (2026, July 4). Washington's Next Tariff Move: Section 301 Hearings Land Just Before the Clock Runs Out. EconoLens. https://econolens.co.in/news/section-301-tariffs-hearing-july-2026
Khagan Rao is an economist and analyst specialising in global monetary policy, fiscal frameworks, and international trade. He tracks publications from the IMF, World Bank, BIS, and RBI to deliver accessible, data-driven analysis for a global audience.